Tuesday, April 8, 2014

Racer X: The article that inspired the fast & the furious

Estevez leads a new generation of fearless young racers burning up New York’s streets and racetracks in their tricked-out Japanese compacts.

 At dusk, they take over the road. Roaring and buzzing like locusts, the swarm of asphalt-scraping Japanese cars — with swooping rear wings and brightly colored logos — merges from the side streets of Uptown Manhattan onto the traffic-congested Henry Hudson Parkway. Zigzagging back and forth like jet-fueled go-carts, they slow to a stop, blocking off three lanes of oncoming cars in preparation for the infamous mile-long run.

A black Nissan 300ZX and a white Mitsubishi Starion pull out of the pack and creep up to the starting line. As the sun dances on the nearby river, the sound of honking horns and screaming drivers is drowned out by the sonic blast of the two engines revving for takeoff. A stocky Latino dude in a blinding yellow shirt stands in the middle of the highway and raises his hands. Both cars lurch and halt like chained pit bulls, their wheels spitting out black smoke. The hands drop.

10 mph: Off the starting line, the Nissan pulls ahead by one car length. 
40 mph: Still in first gear, the driver jams the stick into second, and his head snaps back. The tires let out a brief squeal. 
100 mph: The Starion pulls closer. There’s a halting moment when it looks like the Nissan might lose. It lasts about one hundredth of a second. 
160 mph: Gritting his teeth, the man behind the wheel of the Nissan begins to shake from the speed; his vision is a blur. He doesn’t see the Starion closing in. 
Crossing the finish line, the Nissan driver, Rafael Estevez, wins by one car length. In less than a minute, the guy in the Mitsubishi has lost $7,500. Glowing with confidence, Estevez immediately challenges him for $2,500 and offers an 18-car lead and beats him again.

Estevez, a 30-year-old Dominican drag racer from Washington Heights, is considered an OG among a growing legion of young speed junkies terrorizing the back alleys, highways, and legal racetracks around New York City. The urban dragracing frenzy was started in the early ‘90s by a tightly-knit crew of Asian-American boys in Southern California and is now hitting hard on the East Coast. The hundreds of kids who line New York hot spots like Francis Lewis Boulevard in Queens or the Fountain Avenue strip in Brooklyn every weekend are an urban polyglot of Puerto Rican, Dominican, Chinese, Filipino, Jamaican, Italian and other ethnicities who have one thing in common: They love hurtling metal, meat and rubber through the concrete jungle at dangerous velocities.

Young men have been fascinated with tweaking and tuning big block Chevys and Mustangs since the days of Rebel Without a Cause. But the new guys wouldn’t be caught dead driving the gaudy muscular beasts of yesteryear. Instead, they’re tricking out low-buck Japanese imports like Honda Civics and Acura Integras and tattooing them like skateboards with Neuspeed and Greddy car parts stickers. By stroking the engine, adding a supercharger, and hitting the “juice” (nitrous oxide: a gaseous liquid once used to boost bomber planes in WWII), they can smoke the herb in the Iroc at the stoplight. 
And to do it with a puny four-cylinder rice burner that your moms would drive is downright arrogant. 
“It’s about power. It’s about the control of power,” philosophizes Shawn Rousseau, a chunky West Indian racer in baggy jeans and Timberland boots. He’s hanging out at the packed Eastern Autosports store in Queens, New York, where kids in the scene go to chill and tune their cars. 
“The excitement of going fast is like nothing else,” says Javier Ortega, a Columbian-American who screeches his blue Honda Civic to a halt in front of the store. 
“Another group gets excitement from doing drugs or whatever. Speed excites us.” Few know that excitement like Estevez. Six feet tall with stooped shoulders and a healthy gut, he writes his own rules. Forget about valor, compassion, honor; in his book, that’s all synonymous with second place. 
“People say I cheat all the time,” explains Estevez, a Huck Finn grin spreading across his face.
“They say I jump the line, I do this, I do that. Drag racing is war. If you bring a knife, and I bring a machine gun, you’re dead. That’s it.”

Street rule No. 1: Gun it before the hands drop. 
“Whenever someone is about to go, they always do something with their body,” says Estevez. 
“Right before they drop the clutch, they usually pitch forward. I don’t watch the guy [in between the cars] to say go. I just wait for the other guy to move, and then I go before he does.” Juan J. Sanchez, Estevez’s road dawg of 16 years, describes him as an unbeatable foe. 
“Half of the race is psychology, and mentally he’s set,” says Sanchez. “One way or another, he’ll find a way to beat you even if he’s driving the slower car.”

As a kid growing up in Washington heights, Estevez remembers being transfixed every week by TV’s The Dukes of Hazzard. 
“The Dukes pulled a lot of stunts, soared through the air, and were always getting chased by cops,” he recalls. 
“The best part was they would always get away.” Estevez’s own fantasies of jetting from the potbellied law came together when he first discovered “the Strip” along 190th and Amsterdam Avenue, in Upper Manhattan. 
Over many humid summer nights amid the caramel-colored bodega lights and din of merengue and hip-hop, a younger Estevez came to study the form of the best oldtimers. 
“The guy Carlito, forget it,” says Estevez, both arms going up in mock defeat. “We always used to want to race him.” 
Estevez stood there for hours every weekend evening, taking mental notes: how Carlito’s body shifted moments before take off, his deadlocked gaze, the catlike smirk. It became a to-do checklist for later. Carlito quit racing before Estevez ever got to challenge him. Instead, Estevez raced his boys on a strip behind Shea Stadium.

His first car was a 1972 orange Datsun 510 grocery getter that he pulled apart and reassembled hundreds of times to eke out extra juice. By the time he was 16, Estevez dropped out of school to devote all his time to cars. He worked at several garages, honing his skills on other people’s autos. All the money went right back into his own machine. He constantly remade his car, forging his reputation every time he smoked another friend. That was the heyday of street racing, when wagers soared and reputations rose and fell in the blink of an eye. But then the cops started cracking down.

“It’s a real problem,” says NYPD Chief Michael Ansbro, who’s witnessed racers cutting up traffic along the mile-long strip on the Henry Hudson freeway. 
“I couldn’t believe how many people were weaving in and out of traffic. I’d be doing sixty, and the next thing you know, they’re flying right by.” 
Last summer, a joint operation between Highway One police and the local 24th Precinct targeted illegal racing on 190th and Amsterdam. Between July and December 1997, the police issued 310 speeding tickets and 150 summonses for various violations. Now, a marked squad car works in tandem with an unmarked car during prime weekend hours to apprehend speed demons on the Henry Hudson. Estevez and crew are forever playing cat-andmouse with the police. 
“I do anything I have to do to get away from the cops,” says Estevez, who’s been chased on more than one occasion. 
“I’m not trying to go to jail.” In the past year or so, the street racers have found a few “new drag spots,” but they’ve also begin to turn to the legal racetracks in new Jersey and Long Island to test their mettle. To gun it against the towering digital time boards, among the heavy metal-heads in domestic Mustangs and Camaros, no special license is needed at the entry gate, run through tech inspection, and you’re ready to race.

Tacked onto Estevez’s yellowing fridge door, the flier reads in bold: DRAG WARS: THE TRISTATES FIRST IMPORT STREET DRAG. The stakes are high. Big money sponsors like Penzoil and HKS U.S.A., car magazines Turbo and Super Street, and thousands of spectators from the streets will be keeping score at the Atco Raceway in New Jersey.

Two months before the big race, the boys at Speed and Sound, a tuner shop in Yonkers, relentlessly hammer away at Estevez’s civilianissue ’92 Civic. The transformation is sick. The stock engine has been replaced with a graniteblack motor borrowed from the Acura Integra GSR. Enlarged tubes of matte silver metal called headers loop around the top of the engine bay. They are intended, along with the softball-size turbochargers affixed to the front of the GSR, to dramatically boost output.

Just three days before the event, everything starts to go wrong. Estevez is rushed to the hospital and has to be operated on for an infected appendix. That same evening, he’s back at the shop massaging his bandages as he slowly limps around the car to check everything out. On the big day, the flatbed tow truck they ordered never shows. The car is also acting up. The turbo computer mounted on the dashboard jumps out of its saddle every time the Civic lunges forward. 
“I just hope I don’t break anything,” Estevez says with fingers crossed, not sure if he means himself or the car. He drives it to the track in New Jersey.

It’s an overcast morning, with temperatures hovering near the 70s — a perfect day for racing. On the first run of the day, Estevez scores 12.02 seconds on the quarter mile. Respectable for an amateur, but no big shakes. On Estevez’s second run, it happens.
The Christmas tree lights drop down: Yellow, yellow, yellow… 
His wheels are squealing in their disc-brake bear traps. 
Green, he stuffs the accelerator. 
The car lurches out of the gate and disappears across the horizon. 
Eleven-point-three-six seconds later, Estevez makes history, becoming the East Coast’s fastest Honda car racer.

The five thousand sitting on the bleachers jump to their feet, roaring in the day’s first standing ovation. Estevez didn’t break the California Honda record of 10.61 seconds, but unlike the stripped-down trailer-towed compacts in the West, his car was driven to the track in heavy stock trim, with full glass and interior.

Back at Estevez’s tent, auto industry reps and reporters line up to shakes his hand. Lucrative endorsement deals will pay for the pricey car parts he needs to follow the race circuits up and down the eastern seaboard; and maybe, if Estevez is lucky, he’ll head to Cali, where the big boys will be waiting to take a crack at him. It’s the first glimmer of a legal career in the growing, adrenaline-charged sport of import drag racing. And it’s making him misty-eyed today. 
“I said I would do it, and then I did it,” Estevez says proudly.

A few days later, Estevez is streaking down Henry Hudson Parkway in the Civic, past the sparkling tiara of the New Jersey nightscape. As he floors the now record-setting ride, the cockpit rumbles with Gatling gun intensity. 
Over the roar, whistle, and hiss of the engine, he screams, “Do you hear that fluttering?” He checks off a list of problems. 
“That’s just one thing. The headers are leaking. We need to weld a differential to put more power to the ground; remap the computer. 
“Every time I find another problem with the car, it makes me even happier,” he adds. 
“When I fix it, it means I’ll go even faster.”

His eyes are lowered half-mast, nodding occasionally like he’s studying what the car has to tell him. For Estevez, it’s not the contest between racers that really matters but the abstract dialogue between the soul of a racer and his machine. 
Oddly, the makeshift dash cluttered with gauges — telling him everything from water pressure to fuel mixture — is missing one key thing: a speedometer. 
There’s a good reason. 
“When you know how fast you’re going,” says Estevez, punching the throttle again, “you’ll slow down.”

We stopped checking for monsters under the bed when we realized they were inside us

We stopped checking for monsters under the bed when we realized they were inside us

We all live in our separate houses, boarded up with steel and nails, floating around our stairs and landings like ghosts, all mysteries to each other. Our houses are our safe places, the caves that no one else can reach, that only we know the exact location of. We curl up into the corners of our rooms and showers when the life and the world threatens to knock on our doors, seeking entry. We put up the wall around our minds and we descend into ourselves, like Dante into the Inferno, sheltering ourselves against the unknown and the unwanted. For we do not want life and we do not want the world or happiness. It scares us, for our human instincts, those whispering demons that sprouted in the womb with us and spread out to our brains, tell us that we should be miserable. That is what makes us so great and so special, the fact that we are all so miserable most of the time, subconsciously cherishing our masochism, but consciously whining and complaining about how unhappy we are. Yet we do nothing about it, we simply rock back and forth, back and forth in our corners and let the scalding water beat against our backs as our eyes stay closed and dare not open for fear of seeing light.

But we must go out into the world and mingle with others like ourselves. We place our armours carefully, our bulletproof clothes and we bravely step outside and walk out the door. Our feet carry us to other buildings, other hiding places, and we roam the streets like hungry wolves waiting for something that we don’t quite know. And we wait until the moment we die and then perhaps, some of us realize what it is we truly are looking for, but most of us do not and we perish with sadness in our eyes, still unknowing why we have been so unhappy all of our lives.

And so we walk in the cities and sit in the planes and gesture to strangers and speak to our friends, but there is one thing we do not ever talk about, and that is the monsters. We all have them, deep within our bones and heart, our veins and marrow, they permeate our very souls and we know that they will never leave because like the demons that sprouted in the womb with us, these monsters developed once we were born. Their mother was light, no father to create them, but our bodies became their homes, and they took on the forms of children. They can be seen by anyone of us quite well in the sunlight, for they appear as our shadows, moving exactly like us and mimicking every action that we make. Though the monsters grow as we grow, their spirits never cease to be children, and if one looks very closely, one can see them dancing in the day.

But we humans, we have this trait that we are frightened of everything that we do not understand, and we did not understand why these monsters would want to thrive within us. They opened their hands and smiled at us and told us they would not hurt us, that they were simply here because we are human, not complete animals, humans, and that we are different and need them. But we shook our heads with horror because their hands had sharpened claws, and their teeth were covered with the blood of our brethren and we took steps back and ran. And these monsters, saddened, ran after us, trying to catch us and make us realize that we have no choice, we all have monsters. They tried to make us realize that the only way their claws would retract and their lust for blood would diminish was if we turned toward them and we welcomed them, discussed with them our fears and dreams and hopes and all that is important to man. But humans rarely face what frightens us so the monsters decided to infiltrate our bodies anyway, without a welcome and to stay there until we decided to talk to them. Of course, like us, they grow and they change, but unlike us, they become stronger the more they are ignored. The more we run away from them, the more they become saddened, angry, and lonely, the harder they try to get our attention and soon, they overpower us. It is not their faults, for they are simply monsters and from where they come from, they do not understand this concept of running, they only know of confrontation.

Human nature and monsters have not gotten along together since the beginning of humanity. The former believes, because it has originated from those pure animals that it is superior than the latter. Most humans agree with this and therefore when the demons whisper that these monsters are bad or that these ones are good, we believe them and we either run away harder and push them further down or we slow down to a walking pace and extend a hand to them. However, only the monsters truly know which one of them is good and which one is bad and they have realized that we have got it all backwards. Jealousy, we believe, is a sign that we truly love another human being, whereas the monster Jealousy knows that she is truly one of the worst monsters to be born. Lust, tortured and murdered and spit at for centuries, knows in her heart of hearts that she is one of the most cherished monsters and unfalteringly waits for us to change our minds about her. Yet there are other more powerful monsters such as Power, Pedophilia, Murder, and Cannibalism that we truly do fear for our demons have told us that they are the worst and that we must never look back or we will give in to our urges and we will truly be lost.

And yes, it is true that these monsters are truly powerful and that if we give into our urges, we are truly lost but our demons are not right all of the time. And we do not have the minds or the desire to contradict them so we blindly trust them and run and run and run until we cannot run anymore and the most powerful of monsters, Time, comes, hand in hand with Death, and takes us away. And when Death asks us if we have anything more to say, we sob and ask what we did wrong.
You did not face your monsters. There is no reason to run from them, for if you do, you will not live the life you want and you will always ask yourself why you are so unhappy. You will run to your corner and your house more and more until you will be afraid to walk from it because you will believe that your monster is outside your window looking at your, smiling with those blood-stained teeth, when in reality, it has been inside you all along, patiently waiting for you to speak to it. Do not ignore your monsters for they are not as frightening as you deem them to be. Hush those demons and stop running, turn around, and invite what is inside you to come out. Discuss with yourself why you are so afraid, discuss with yourself that you truly are strong. For your monsters do not want to tear you down and they do not understand why you scream at them so when all they are doing is waiting for you. Only you can tear yourself down and it is your fault if your monsters grow and you burst, for only you let them do that and only you ran and ignored them. If the monsters truly are a danger, then you must curb them, like a parent curbs a child and they will learn to listen to you. Until then, they will be pouting as they face the wall, concocting plans of revenge in their infantile minds.

Do not be afraid of those around you, for they have the same monsters that you do. We are all the same and we all have these creatures within us. Whether we only have Lust or whether we have Pedophilia, we all must face what we fear and decide whether we truly must fear it or whether we must accept it and be careful that our demons do not grow louder and louder and tell us that our monsters have overpowered us. They cannot and they will not unless we let them and unless we want them to. It is not our monsters that we must be afraid of, it is our human nature, that which we take for granted. We must not take anything for granted, we must always think through it and let it confront us, for then we will not ask us why we cannot step out once again from our houses. We will not ask Death why we are so unhappy and we will not whimper self-pityingly for decades, believing we are powerless. We are not. We are more powerful than our monsters and our demons and we are more powerful than we give ourselves credit for.

Thursday, April 3, 2014

Funny how a melody can evoke a feeling

I don't know why—maybe it's the melody, or her voice—but this song has crept into my soul this morning. 
When a piece of music can transcend just entertainment and actually evoke an emotional response I think there's something special and powerful about that. 


http://bit.ly/1h6Tfar

THE JEZABELS

'A Little Piece'

There's a cold, easy glow dancing over our street

I could have chased it down. I could have held your love,
But wouldn't you think me weak?
Of all, I should know how the streets come and go
When you chase the kaleidoscope dream, but,
Stranger, baby, always keep me in your sweet memory.

Biting cold, thrashing, scolding,
Drown me under our street
Perfect hips, perfect hips, she was perfect lips,
Pieces of your heart splattered on the cliff

We go home, watch a movie.
Tell me can you feel the beat?
Getting loose, getting loose, she was
Letting those feeling loose, she was, becoming a monster

She drew the line in the mind. She was not holding on.

And have you been through the sea, on the night.
Hold me tight. Babe, we've got it.
And did you find, that you'd like
A little piece of cherry pie,
Hot from the oven, from the oven.

And it was, "who let the girl out?"
Let the dog out
"Let the girl out,"
Don't you miss me the way I miss you.
Sailor, sailor, sailor, I'm sending birds to watch over you.

And when you see honah lee is a lie, hold me tight.
Babe, we've got it.
And all you need, honestly,
A little piece of cherry pie
Hot from the oven.

On your knees, face me,
cherry pie, baby.

On your knees, face me,
cherry pie, baby.

The difference between men and women

 
Let's say a guy named Fred is attracted to a woman named Martha. He asks her out to a movie; she accepts; they have a pretty good time. A few nights later he asks her out to dinner, and again they enjoy themselves. They continue to see each other regularly, and after a while neither one of them is seeing anybody else.

And then, one evening when they're driving home, a thought occurs to Martha, and, without really thinking, she says it aloud: "Do you realize that, as of tonight, we've been seeing each other for exactly six months?"

And then, there is silence in the car.

To Martha, it seems like a very loud silence. She thinks to herself: I wonder if it bothers him that I said that. Maybe he's been feeling confined by our relationship; maybe he thinks I'm trying to push him into some kind of obligation that he doesn't want, or isn't sure of.

And Fred is thinking: Gosh. Six months.

And Martha is thinking: But, hey, I'm not so sure I want this kind of relationship either. Sometimes I wish I had a little more space, so I'd have time to think about whether I really want us to keep going the way we are, moving steadily towards, I mean, where are we going? Are we just going to keep seeing each other at this level of intimacy? Are we heading toward marriage? Toward children? Toward a lifetime together? Am I ready for that level of commitment? Do I really even know this person?

And Fred is thinking: ...so that means it was...let's see...February when we started going out, which was right after I had the car at the dealer's, which means...lemme check the odometer...Whoa! I am way overdue for an oil change here.

And Martha is thinking: He's upset. I can see it on his face. Maybe I'm reading this completely wrong. Maybe he wants more from our relationship, more intimacy, more commitment; maybe he has sensed - even before I sensed it - that I was feeling some reservations. Yes, I bet that's it. That's why he's so reluctant to say anything about his own feelings. He's afraid of being rejected.

And Fred is thinking: And I'm gonna have them look at the transmission again. I don't care what those morons say, it's still not shifting right. And they better not try to blame it on the cold weather this time. What cold weather? It's 87 degrees out, and this thing is shifting like a garbage truck, and I paid those incompetent thieves $600.

And Martha is thinking: He's angry. And I don't blame him. I'd be angry, too. I feel so guilty, putting him through this, but I can't help the way I feel. I'm just not sure.

And Fred is thinking: They'll probably say it's only a 90-day warranty...scumballs.

And Martha is thinking: Maybe I'm just too idealistic, waiting for a knight to come riding up on his white horse, when I'm sitting right next to a perfectly good person, a person I enjoy being with, a person I truly do care about, a person who seems to truly care about me. A person who is in pain because of my self-centered, schoolgirl romantic fantasy.

And Fred is thinking: Warranty? They want a warranty? I'll give them a warranty. I'll take their warranty and stick it right up their...

"Fred," Martha says aloud.

"What?" says Fred, startled.

"Please don't torture yourself like this," she says, her eyes beginning to brim with tears. "Maybe I should never have...oh dear, I feel so..."(She breaks down, sobbing.)

"What?" says Fred.

"I'm such a fool," Martha sobs. "I mean, I know there's no knight. I really know that. It's silly. There's no knight, and there's no horse."

"There's no horse?" says Fred.

"You think I'm a fool, don't you?" Martha says.

"No!" says Fred, glad to finally know the correct answer.

"It's just that...it's that I...I need some time," Martha says.

(There is a 15-second pause while Fred, thinking as fast as he can, tries to come up with a safe response. Finally he comes up with one that he thinks might work.)

"Yes," he says. (Martha, deeply moved, touches his hand.)

"Oh, Fred, do you really feel that way?" she says.

"What way?" says Fred.

"That way about time," says Martha.

"Oh," says Fred. "Yes." (Martha turns to face him and gazes deeply into his eyes, causing him to become very nervous about what she might say next, especially if it involves a horse. At last she speaks.)

"Thank you, Fred," she says.

"Thank you," says Fred.

Then he takes her home, and she lies on her bed, a conflicted, tortured soul, and weeps until dawn, whereas when Fred gets back to his place, he opens a bag of Doritos, turns on the TV, and immediately becomes deeply involved in a rerun of a college basketball game between two South Dakota junior colleges that he has never heard of. A tiny voice in the far recesses of his mind tells him that something major was going on back there in the car, but he is pretty sure there is no way he would ever understand what, and so he figures it's better if he doesn't think about it.

The next day Martha will call her closest friend, or perhaps two of them, and they will talk about this situation for six straight hours. In painstaking detail, they will analyze everything she said and everything he said, going over it time and time again, exploring every word, expression, and gesture for nuances of meaning, considering every possible ramification.

They will continue to discuss this subject, off and on, for weeks, maybe months, never reaching any definite conclusions, but never getting bored with it either.

Meanwhile, Fred, while playing racquetball one day with a mutual friend of his and Martha's, will pause just before serving, frown, and say: "Norm, did Martha ever own a horse?"

That is pretty much the difference between how men and women's minds work. 

Wednesday, April 2, 2014

Before you accuse me...



This morning I was reading an article on über-liberal Slate written by a black woman about how she sees liberal whites as "frenemies." I quit reading when I got to the term "cultural competency training." The reason there is a rift in culture is a direct result of black culture purposely trying to alienate white people. It's bred by the uneducated passing social faux pas stemming from their previous non-inclusion. Instead of adapting, it's used as a crutch to complain that the establishment is treating you unfairly instead of acknowledging that you haven't invested the commensurate effort to learn the ways of proper society. And yes, I just said that stereotypical black culture isn't 'proper society,' so many will dismiss this as a racist statement and to them I can only lament how they're brainwashed by the racial hate-mongering sect. No one looks down more on 'urban culture' than those elderly people of color who fought and suffered for equality only to see the fruits of their efforts now purposely ignore the opportunity to acclimate as they so wished they could. 

Republicans should tone down their religious rhetoric

GOP Should Not Turn Away From Secularism
Jeremy Kolassa / March 19, 2014

It is mere coincidence that as I write this, the founder of the Westboro Baptist Church, Fred Phelps Sr., lies dying? It wasn’t my intention to write this as he was – while I hold no love for the man, I won’t dance on his grave either – but it is what it is. And that “it” is that Republicans should not be afraid of secularism and atheists, and perhaps should tone down their religious rhetoric.

It may seem that social conservatism, Christianity, and the Religious Right are the bread and butter of the Republican Party. American conservatism is defined in many places as wishing for less government involvement in the economy, but having it promote a particular worldview in society, one that is usually Christian. Indeed, not a day goes by without some conservative or Republican leader calling on us to return to Biblical law, which supposedly was the basis for the United States. (It really wasn’t.) Looking at the numbers, though, at least from a marketing and recruiting standpoint, this is unstainable. It is also unnecessary.

Let’s look at the demographic data. About 20% of Americans have no religious affiliation, and that is a group that has been increasing rapidly – up from just 8% in 1990. I must stress, though, that these are not all atheists and agnostics: according to the Pew study where this number comes from, 68% of these unaffiliated people believe in God. (37% say they are “spiritual but not religious.”) What’s most interesting is in the ages: 34% of younger millennials (those born between 1990 and 1994) and 30% of older millennials (born between 1981 and 1989) are unaffiliated. (There’s even one argument out there that blames the decline of American Christianity on it’s heavy politicization since Jerry Falwell formed the Moral Majority.)

Politically, the Pew study says  the unaffiliated lean more towards the Democratic Party, but I want to challenge that a bit with a study from another academic. Razib Khan, writing for Discover Magazine, noted in a study of atheists (so a smaller dataset than the Pew study) that over 20% of atheists “identify as Republicans or conservatives.” Khan argues that most “conservative” atheists are in fact libertarians. Considering that many arguments for socially conservative positions are based, in some way, on religion, tradition, or cultural uniformity, that is not surprising. However, that’s also a gross oversimplification.

For instance, I know an atheist who is not just a libertarian, but who is also pro-life. There is, in fact, an entirely secular pro-life movement out there. You might think that positions we commonly deem to be socially conservative are incompatible with a nonreligious mindset, but clearly, that is wrong.

One of the top writers at National Review is an atheist: Charles C. W. Cooke. He is British, sort of the anti-Piers Morgan, coming from a conservative tradition that sees no contradiction in being an atheist conservative. Cooke writes that much of what drives his conservatism also drives his atheism, and that the two positions can and do work well together. It mirrors similar writings by Heather MacDonald at the Richard Dawkins Foundation. (Yes, a pro-conservatism piece at the Richard Dawkins Foundation. I’ll give you a moment to catch your breath.) Skepticism towards religion also frequently – if the skeptic is intellectually honest – blurs into skepticism about government. Indeed, it is a powerful force for limited government.

I also want to stress a difference between atheism, being nonreligious, and secularism. Atheism comes in two standard flavors: negative atheism, which simply says “I do not believe in a god” (though with the possibility of being proved wrong later); and positive atheism, which says “There is no god.” Nonreligion is more akin to just not going to church (a ritual that only about 40% of Americans actually partake in, religious or not.) Secularism, on the other hand, is simply the separation of church and state, and that political decisions should be free of religious influences.

That last part is important, both because it is ingrained in our nation’s past and it should be the way forward for the GOP’s future. Our Founding Fathers, wary and weary of the religious strife in the old world which was a result of state churches and kings mandating their followers take their own personal religion, were adamant that freedom of religion be a fundamental principle of the new nation. In 1777, Thomas Jefferson drafted the Virginia Statue for Religious Freedom, which disestablished the Church of England (the state church in the colonies at the time) and provided freedom of religion to everyone—including Catholics and Jews, who weren’t exactly at the top of the popularity charts in that era.

The 1797 Treaty of Tripoli specified that the American government was “not, in any sense, founded on the Christian religion”, and most of the Founding Fathers were more Deist than Christian. Keeping the church and the state in two separate spheres was seen as essential not just to freedom and liberty, but also to social cohesion and peace. Much blood had been shed in Europe over which religion would control government and force itself on others; better to sidestep the whole question entirely and recognize that in their minds and in their hearts, individuals were sovereign, not the government, and just let them be.

As the number of the religious unaffiliated grow in America, and American youth especially turn away from organized religion, the GOP would be wise to start embracing secularism. There is nothing wrong with being a Christian or any other religious believer, and certainly I am not advocating for the GOP to start embracing irreligion whole hog. However, it would be unwise to ignore this growing segment of the citizenry, and – especially with the conservative and libertarian elements I noted above – abandon them to the Democratic Party, essentially giving them free voters.

Beyond that, however, we must acknowledge that there are many, many more Christians in America than there are consistent Republican voters. Trying to push public policy on the basis of religious arguments risks turning off those denominations with a different theological view.

Is that really wise? Do we really need more people registering as Independents or going elsewhere?

Writing on the blog Secular Right, in response to Cooke’s post (and citing one of his own, earlier writings), Andrew Stuttaford makes a great point that conservatives should not ignore:

Godless conservatives however are rarely anti-religious [Charlie makes a similar point]. They often appreciate religion as a force for social cohesion and as a link to a nation’s past. They may push back hard against religious extremism, but, unlike today’s “new atheists” they are most unlikely to be found railing against “sky fairies.” Mankind has evolved in a way that makes it strongly disposed towards religious belief, and conservatism is based on recognizing human nature for what it is.

That means facing the fact that gods will, one way or another, always be with us.

Granted, not all nonreligious people are like this. There are sadly more than a few people who could charitably be described as “morons”. There are more than enough, however, who follow Stuttaford’s philosophy. “Disbelief” is not the same as “hate” or “hostility.” Making them all out to be enemies would be a mistake.

The makeup of the American populace is changing in many ways. One of them is that more Americans are not having a religion. Republicans can still be Christian (or Jewish, or even Muslim, or Buddhist, or Pagan.) You can still have a deep religious belief. But don’t ignore Americans who think differently, and don’t turn them away by trying to push a particular religious view. That will not bode well at the ballot box or in public policy.