Monday, October 7, 2013

GRAVITY is a work of Art

“At 600 km above planet Earth, the temperature fluctuates between +258 and -148 degrees Fahrenheit. There is nothing to carry sound. No air pressure. No oxygen. Life in space is impossible.” -Title Card from GRAVITY


 We usually tend to view motion pictures purely as entertainment. We praise intense action sequences and elucidate on witty dialogue while describing the merits of films that endear themselves to us. Too often, it seems, we forget that these aren’t just movies; these are films, and films are technically works of art. Art should elicit an emotional response from its audience, and in this Alphonso Cuarón’s Gravity refuses to disappoint.
 Viewed as a synopsis, there doesn’t seem to be a lot going on in Gravity. There are really only 2 characters and there’s mainly just one setting. But underneath this stripped concept lies layers of despondency, action, fear and humility. This is very much a story of the all too fleeting joy of life itself. Cuarón deserves as much credit for the overwhelming emotion his film evokes as he does for the breathtaking visual masterpiece he’s crafted. For such a small story, Gravity’s scope is massive, as one would expect from a tale about survival with the whole world as the backdrop. Its the seemingly innocuous minutia, though, that add depth and specter to what would, in the hands of a lessor filmmaker, become gee-whiz 3D gimmicks. I seriously doubt its a spoiler to tell you that there’s a scene in which Sandra Bullock’s character Dr. Ryan Stone cries, but I was in awe of how subtly the tears float off her cheek and into the foreground, jump into focus through the 3D effect briefly, and then subside back to join their brethren in the most natural, yet inventive way possible. The sound, and lack thereof, incorporates the audience into the story to eerie effect. We are treated both to an accurate rendering of what Dr. Stone would hear inside her space suit’s helmet, and to establishing shots from an outside perspective that create an unnerving effect as we see action unfold in utter silence.

  SPOILERS FOLLOW

Alphonso Cuarón knows pain. Dr. Ryan Stone is the conduit through which we are witness to, among other things, her numbly describing her daughter’s death, accepting the fact that she is “...going to die today,” her guilt over watching the only other survivor sacrifice himself to give her a chance, and of course the terrifying sequence where she is floating out into open space with no bearing that’s shown in the film’s trailers. Cuarón also knows reprieve, as Dr. Stone’s heart-wrenching emotional toll is tempered by a beautiful floating fetal position rest, a hero’s monologue where hopes soar, and the final scene as our heroine walks out of the sea and basks in the sheer elation that she has survived as the music swells and the screen fades to black.
Honestly, the conclusion of Gravity feels disingenuous to me. I can perceive two points where the film would have rang more true had it ended. The first would be Dr. Stone accepting her fate and dying in the escape pod as she turned off the air pressure, the second would be abruptly ending after she had her yippee-ki-yay moment and started re-entry, leaving the audience hanging as to her fate. That said, I loved the ending. Real life usually doesn’t have a happy ending, and its nice to leave the theater feeling good about life.

Thursday, July 25, 2013

Time to escape

A friend asked me the other night, in a moment both of us were grappling to understand reality from the throes of inebriation, if I could go anywhere in the world, where would that be.
Alcohol is a wondrous thing, if for no other reason that it can help to clarify the truth of your perspective. 
I had to think mere seconds before I answered "The island where they filmed The Beach."

I will be leaving next month for a European trek which should span roughly 8 weeks. I now think that the end of that trip should see me to Thailand. 


Monday, June 17, 2013

Man of Steel sucks

After having a few days to stew over it, Ive decided I was entirely too generous in giving Man of Steel a "C" rating. It deserved no better than a D-, and I'm mulling over just flat-out calling it an F. That may seem harsh because it can't really be that bad, can it? I've decided that the awesome cast it boasts, and the fact that it had some stellar moments (Kevin Costner deserves 90% of the credit for that) are completely negated by the raping of the mythos that's made Superman an iconic hero (I'm mostly talking about the ending, which I won't spoil, but its not something I can reconcile with my idea of the character) and a butt-numbing 2.5 hour run time that's bloated by repetitively pointless fight scenes. Man of Steel isn't as bad as the all-time worsts like Manos Hands of Fate, or Plan 9 From Outer Space, but those movies were made on micro-budgets with inexperienced actors and never had much of a chance. The newest Superman, however, boasts a multi-million dollar budget, a cast of well-known, respected actors and was written and produced by a dream team consisting of David S. Goyer and Christopher Noland. The fact, then, that it fails to capitalize on all these positives and bores audiences with too much exposition (we all know what happened to Krypton), and over-complicated plot executed poorly, and about an hour of invincible characters fighting each other (causing massive collateral damage that's never mentioned) is more than just disappointing…its a flat-out crime against cinema. As such, I think its fair to judge it more harshly than some B-movie schlock and hold it to higher standards. That said, I think I'll be generous and give Man of Steel an overall rating of "D."

Tuesday, June 11, 2013

Anti-theft measures in Apple's newest mobile OS will cause huge problems for legitimate resellers.

iOS7 Poses a Problem for iPhone Resellers One of the new features of iOS 7, Apple's newest mobile operating system that's poised to drop in the fall, is "Activation Lock," a security implement designed to stop i-device thieves by making the phone so that it cannot be wiped clean (via the erase all content and settings option) or restored to a new device without knowing the password of the previous iCloud account that was associated with it. Many people sell their iPhones. Either they're upgrading, have damage and choose to unload it to someone who'll fix it, or they swap platforms or carriers. Many people are also technical novices. They forget passwords; they don't understand how cloud storage systems work, etc. Unfortunately, these two realities are going to cause lots of trouble with the new "Activation Lock" feature. Yes, it will stop thieves, but Activation Lock security is also going to screw honest people buying second-hand phones from other honest folks (and definitely honest people buying phones from not-so-honest folks). The iCloud password of the account associated with the phone is now going to be necessary to activate or even wipe the phone. Its tied somehow to the UDID, and so it can't be bypassed. No restore or DFU mode will get you out of this quagmire. Its going to end up with strangers whom you sold your phone calling and asking for your password, or some pissed off consumers ready to draw and quarter you because they think you tried to get over on them.